Closed CASES

United States v. Skrmetti
Gender Affirming Care, Equal Protection, Trans Healthcare, Tennessee, Kentucky, Supreme Court, Due Process, Parental Rights, 6th Circuit Mack Karbon Gender Affirming Care, Equal Protection, Trans Healthcare, Tennessee, Kentucky, Supreme Court, Due Process, Parental Rights, 6th Circuit Mack Karbon

United States v. Skrmetti

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

On June 18, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the ban does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, meaning states can prohibit medical treatments for transgender people, even if those treatments are legal for cisgender individuals.

Read More
L.E. v. Lee
Equal Protection, Trans Youth, Athletics, Fourteenth Amendment, Middle District of Tennessee, Tennessee, Title IX, Academia Mack Karbon Equal Protection, Trans Youth, Athletics, Fourteenth Amendment, Middle District of Tennessee, Tennessee, Title IX, Academia Mack Karbon

L.E. v. Lee

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA - CLOSED MAR 2024

On March 29, 2024, the district court ruled in favor of Plaintiff L.E. and found that Tennessee’s discriminatory Gender in Athletics Law violated L.E.’s rights by denying him the chance to try out for the boys’ golf team.

Read More
Williams v. Kincaid et al.
ADA, Gender Dysphoria, Gender Affirming Care, Rehabilitation Act, Gross Negligence, Virginia, Fourth Circuit, Supreme Court, Prison, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Failure to Accommodate Mack Karbon ADA, Gender Dysphoria, Gender Affirming Care, Rehabilitation Act, Gross Negligence, Virginia, Fourth Circuit, Supreme Court, Prison, Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, Failure to Accommodate Mack Karbon

Williams v. Kincaid et al.

FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS - CLOSED NOV 2023

Ms. Williams was a transgender woman who was subjected to unlawful mistreatment when she was housed within a male prison facility for 6 months, subjected to extreme harassment by guards and inmates, and denied access to hormone treatment. On August 16, 2022, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark ruling finding that gender dysphoria is not excluded from the definition of “disability” under the ADA, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Read More